![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fuzzy Logic and the economics of sustainability
Welcome |
Fuzzy logic has so many applications--it literally boggles the mind. But there is one that truly fascinates--the application of fuzzy to the social sciences. Now as most of you may know, the social sciences are not very scientific. By trying to describe human behavior in binary terms, the social sciences mostly produce computerized gibberish. Most output can be charitably described as very bad literature. In most cases, this is harmless--the exception is economics. Economics in the late 1990s is still not very scientific. As a descriptive exercise, economics is merely awful. As a prescriptive exercise, economics virtually mandates environmental ruin. The message is simple: If the social sciences do not become more scientific, the economists of the world will continue to prescribe disasters. And I am convinced that only fuzzy logic can lead to truly scientific economics. |
Charles the key |
In Fuzzy Logic: the discovery of a revolutionary computer technology and how it is changing our world by Daniel McNeill and Paul Freiberger, Simon and Schuster 1993 p29. The authors describe Mr. Charles Sanders Peirce as one of the two intellectual progenitors of Zedeh's fuzzy logic. (The other was Jan Lukasiewicz.)
|
Charles part two |
One of Peirce's students at Johns Hopkins in Baltimore was a young man named Thorstein Veblen. Besides giving the language the expression "conspicuous consumption," Veblen influenced a whole generation of economists who gave America The Great Prosperity between 1940 and 1973. He also wrote a magnificent work called "Why Economics is not an Evolutionary Science." Veblen did not really have an answer to the points he raised beyond suggesting that only the technologically literate have any business operating the important levers of an industrial state. By the time Lotfi Zedeh had invented fuzzy logic, Veblen had mostly
been forgotten. So it has taken some time to make the obvious link between
these two descendants of Peirce. It is quite likely that Veblen would
have been excited about the possibilities of fuzzy logic and would have
considered it a useful evolution in methodological thinking. If the social sciences insist on operating with the primitive logic
of Aristotle, then they can never really become scientific because they
can never really describe the reality of human existence. |
About this site |
Fuzzy logic has more good minds (and good websites) than Veblen. Therefore, much of this site is devoted to restoring the intellectual reputation of Albert Einstein's favorite American science writer. Any intellectual descendant of Lotfi Zedeh should find Veblen quite fascinating. Both were superb minds. This site intends to build bridges between the intellectual great-grandchildren of Charles Sanders Peirce. Included at this site is the paper presented at the 1996 International Thorstein Veblen Association (ITVA)--as a .pdf file--trying to link Veblen's great intellectual distinction between the leisure and industrial classes with Fuzzy Logic. |
|